<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Political Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://political-economy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://political-economy.com</link>
	<description>Economics and Politics - the real story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:50:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 101 reasons &#8211; Obama in 2012 will not be re-elected by Mark Biernat</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/obama-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-9602</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Biernat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=2249#comment-9602</guid>
		<description>Santorum is a threat to a GOP victory in 2012 because he is painted as a conservative, whereas Romney as a moderate. The election is determined by not the right or the left but the center. However, even if Santorum is the nominee, I would not say Obama will win. This is because:

I do not think Obama has the answers. In fact I know he does not. Not for the economy (New deal II = Raw deal for those not in the public sector, if we recover it will be in spite of his policies), not for foreign policy (continuing the Bush-Obama doctrine) and not for monetary policy (long live the boom bust cycle). His administration has been a complete failure.

I sometimes in my movements of weakness think his social medical coverage is not that bad. On an abstract level it is actually a good thing, as despite the statistics, a lot of people I know do not have medical coverage or something with a deductible so high it is not worth mentioning. Further, if we stopped the overseas wars and just had homeland security and American soil defense, we could afford all this and more. It does work at some level in Europe, but not to the end.

However, I know this would be adding fuel to the fire and would be another unending stream of debt and credit the USA would be strapped with, if human nature concerning &#039;free&#039; is correct.

Dislike me if you will, but I am pro-life and can not support the idea that I am funding Obama&#039;s vision of treating pregnancy under preventive care. That is, I have to pay for other people&#039;s contraception or termination of life. Children are not a disease in my view. That alone will not allow me to vote for Obama.

Obama is leading the USA to a path that is not congruent with many people&#039;s views in the USA and moral beliefs. They might not voice this aloud because they are afraid of being shouted down.

In the end, maybe it is not the economics as much as the silent army of devout people who see Obama leading America down a dark path. 

I am not in any way shape or form a fundamentalist, just the opposite. In fact pretty liberal in my beliefs about morality, I think most would brand me as borderline heretic or at least progressive thinker to the max. I am anti supernaturalist, cynic, skeptic, I like organizations like the Skeptical inquirer and debunkers like the Amazing Randi, but also love theology of Hans Kung or writing of Martin Gardner. So it I am pretty far left on the belief&#039;s spectrum.

However:

Obama is anti religious. Romney made this point and the Whitehouse can cry, but it is true if you look at things like the mandate to insurers and other issues.

I can not go along with the Obama&#039;s secular humanism and disrespect for the constitituion regarding the first amendment. I think in the voting many people will see it this way too.

Therefore, I am sticking to my position that Obama is unelectable in 2012. I would rather say &#039;you will see&#039;, than &#039;I told you so&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Santorum is a threat to a GOP victory in 2012 because he is painted as a conservative, whereas Romney as a moderate. The election is determined by not the right or the left but the center. However, even if Santorum is the nominee, I would not say Obama will win. This is because:</p>
<p>I do not think Obama has the answers. In fact I know he does not. Not for the economy (New deal II = Raw deal for those not in the public sector, if we recover it will be in spite of his policies), not for foreign policy (continuing the Bush-Obama doctrine) and not for monetary policy (long live the boom bust cycle). His administration has been a complete failure.</p>
<p>I sometimes in my movements of weakness think his social medical coverage is not that bad. On an abstract level it is actually a good thing, as despite the statistics, a lot of people I know do not have medical coverage or something with a deductible so high it is not worth mentioning. Further, if we stopped the overseas wars and just had homeland security and American soil defense, we could afford all this and more. It does work at some level in Europe, but not to the end.</p>
<p>However, I know this would be adding fuel to the fire and would be another unending stream of debt and credit the USA would be strapped with, if human nature concerning &#8216;free&#8217; is correct.</p>
<p>Dislike me if you will, but I am pro-life and can not support the idea that I am funding Obama&#8217;s vision of treating pregnancy under preventive care. That is, I have to pay for other people&#8217;s contraception or termination of life. Children are not a disease in my view. That alone will not allow me to vote for Obama.</p>
<p>Obama is leading the USA to a path that is not congruent with many people&#8217;s views in the USA and moral beliefs. They might not voice this aloud because they are afraid of being shouted down.</p>
<p>In the end, maybe it is not the economics as much as the silent army of devout people who see Obama leading America down a dark path. </p>
<p>I am not in any way shape or form a fundamentalist, just the opposite. In fact pretty liberal in my beliefs about morality, I think most would brand me as borderline heretic or at least progressive thinker to the max. I am anti supernaturalist, cynic, skeptic, I like organizations like the Skeptical inquirer and debunkers like the Amazing Randi, but also love theology of Hans Kung or writing of Martin Gardner. So it I am pretty far left on the belief&#8217;s spectrum.</p>
<p>However:</p>
<p>Obama is anti religious. Romney made this point and the Whitehouse can cry, but it is true if you look at things like the mandate to insurers and other issues.</p>
<p>I can not go along with the Obama&#8217;s secular humanism and disrespect for the constitituion regarding the first amendment. I think in the voting many people will see it this way too.</p>
<p>Therefore, I am sticking to my position that Obama is unelectable in 2012. I would rather say &#8216;you will see&#8217;, than &#8216;I told you so&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 101 reasons &#8211; Obama in 2012 will not be re-elected by Paul Byrd</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/obama-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-9582</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Byrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=2249#comment-9582</guid>
		<description>I think many of you are forgetting one very important thing.  About 50% of Republicans are still moderates, and the conservative values seen in this article are not representitive of the more moderate middle.  (BTW - I am Republican, just in case anyone really cares)  I suspect that if the Republican party goes conservative (Santorum), and I believe it will, Obama will win.  It won&#039;t be by a great margin, but he will win.  A good deal of the middle ground moderate Republicans don&#039;t associate themselves with hard core conservative values.  They will either vote Obama (very quietly of course), or they won&#039;t vote at all.  Either way, this gives Obama an advantage.  So, I wouldn&#039;t write him off just yet.  The economy is improving somewhat, and he only needs about 2 more percentage points to really put the squeeze on the Republican challenger.  I fear a wild swing to the right will doom us to four more years of this highly progressive president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many of you are forgetting one very important thing.  About 50% of Republicans are still moderates, and the conservative values seen in this article are not representitive of the more moderate middle.  (BTW &#8211; I am Republican, just in case anyone really cares)  I suspect that if the Republican party goes conservative (Santorum), and I believe it will, Obama will win.  It won&#8217;t be by a great margin, but he will win.  A good deal of the middle ground moderate Republicans don&#8217;t associate themselves with hard core conservative values.  They will either vote Obama (very quietly of course), or they won&#8217;t vote at all.  Either way, this gives Obama an advantage.  So, I wouldn&#8217;t write him off just yet.  The economy is improving somewhat, and he only needs about 2 more percentage points to really put the squeeze on the Republican challenger.  I fear a wild swing to the right will doom us to four more years of this highly progressive president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Algorithmic trading &#8211; How can you compete in the Stock market by Chris</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/algorithnic-trading-stock-market/comment-page-1/#comment-9514</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=2828#comment-9514</guid>
		<description>You are spot on, you can&#039;t compete against the hedge funds with their super fast computers, best strategy for most people is a quantitative stockscreen system that has been tested over the long-term.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are spot on, you can&#8217;t compete against the hedge funds with their super fast computers, best strategy for most people is a quantitative stockscreen system that has been tested over the long-term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans are spoiled by y0unggun</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/americans-are-spoiled/comment-page-1/#comment-9490</link>
		<dc:creator>y0unggun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.political-economy.com/?p=198#comment-9490</guid>
		<description>If you were born poor, remember its how you lived your whole life. I myself am 100% spoiled, I was born into this life style and one day hope to be a lot more grateful by traveling too. My parent on the other hand used to be poor and have gotten a very long way to give me this life so I don&#039;t have to live the way they did. They barley had a house, slept on floors, sold bread for money, and abused, not to mention their whole family had drug problems and they never touched it. Oh yeah that was America. 
                
  Yes most of america is spoiled. I agree with that but america is good at what it does. Making money. We have resources, industries,machines,and it makes it easier.
 Hmm let me think, if I gave a poor european a smart government, food $$ a job, her family support,tv internet,a car and more stuff, would they take it? I believe so.

 I&#039;m fortunate that America&#039;s founding fathers where inventors,hard workers and knew exactly how to run a government. Maybe other countries should learn from our success. No they wont because they leaders would rather lead and not listen to their county, their people. 

 Of course I&#039;m not as educated as you, because you have been around the world, which I need to do or hope to do. I appreciate your insight but for being a patriot, you sound like your putting yourself on pedestal and disrespecting America. How about this, why don&#039;t you look at euros, Chinas and all the other countries governments, and see what they do wrong, because obviously We are doing something right, because were spoiled.

 I also do not like to hear people waste there $$ on wasteful products, I don&#039;t like seeing stupid wasteful product, and I don&#039;t like hearing people complain when they don&#039;t get what they want when they want from there parents, when the children do nothing.

 Some Americans complain that they can&#039;t get jobs, that don&#039;t have no  car, that our economy sucks, and they say this because all they can get is a 8$ job and they want better. They complain because they want a better life, is that bad? to want the best for yourself,to be the best that you can be? If anyone in  a third world county were in my shoes, they would also be all they can be, buying triple patted sandwiches and driving in a car for ther work.

I am very open-minded and would like to visit other countries just to see how things are, to meet people, to appreciate, to look at other cultures and if I have to eat potatoes everyday, I will.

What is poor, it&#039;s this

Poor equates to people who live in the ghetto, or slums. They live in fear of dying from other people. They can barley afford food and ther housing( ow yea, they live in houses or apartments because you can&#039;t build a house in a city,even if there is nothing but wildlife and trees, if cops catch you, you&#039;ll get it taken away, and its hard to live off the grid, with no one and nothing, you&#039;d pity much have to learn a complete new life style, like an Indian, and you can&#039;t farm and plant potatoes). poor have tiny TVs, and don&#039;t worry it doesn&#039;t cost much thy are not spoiled.

A lot of poor parts of America have gangs and drugs. which means thers a good chance you will get your stuff stolen,specially if you&#039;re an easy target, which makes kids join gangs to seek protection. now they must kill, threat in, represent theer gang, steal, do drugs, sell drugs. ther no going back now, those kids and their kid will be in the grand life style. always having to watch ther back, being afraid to die, or family dyeing.

They make money but at a price.they may also get addicted to drugs, which may cost them there live. the sad part is, they don&#039;t really have a choice, they are pressured to go into that life style since children. that is poor. 

Sounds like a wonderful life doesnt it. But that&#039;s rich in other countries so they shouldnt complain. get real, we got brains, and if some has to live a bad life,wether it be, no food, no electricity, gangs, America China, Germany, it doesnt matter, they can complain, who cares. if you&#039;re not allowed to complain because its pointless then don&#039;t but either way they are poor. please, im sure you would love to change your normal or poor life for a poor persons life in america because that s rich for you right. good luck dodging bullets.

All I see are negative comments, come on now, wish you could switch lives with them, because the poor here are rich, and you dont have to work hard for it, right.

Lastly no hard feelings, good luck, Nice article, and I am a patriot, and don&#039;t be such a hater. Peace.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were born poor, remember its how you lived your whole life. I myself am 100% spoiled, I was born into this life style and one day hope to be a lot more grateful by traveling too. My parent on the other hand used to be poor and have gotten a very long way to give me this life so I don&#8217;t have to live the way they did. They barley had a house, slept on floors, sold bread for money, and abused, not to mention their whole family had drug problems and they never touched it. Oh yeah that was America. </p>
<p>  Yes most of america is spoiled. I agree with that but america is good at what it does. Making money. We have resources, industries,machines,and it makes it easier.<br />
 Hmm let me think, if I gave a poor european a smart government, food $$ a job, her family support,tv internet,a car and more stuff, would they take it? I believe so.</p>
<p> I&#8217;m fortunate that America&#8217;s founding fathers where inventors,hard workers and knew exactly how to run a government. Maybe other countries should learn from our success. No they wont because they leaders would rather lead and not listen to their county, their people. </p>
<p> Of course I&#8217;m not as educated as you, because you have been around the world, which I need to do or hope to do. I appreciate your insight but for being a patriot, you sound like your putting yourself on pedestal and disrespecting America. How about this, why don&#8217;t you look at euros, Chinas and all the other countries governments, and see what they do wrong, because obviously We are doing something right, because were spoiled.</p>
<p> I also do not like to hear people waste there $$ on wasteful products, I don&#8217;t like seeing stupid wasteful product, and I don&#8217;t like hearing people complain when they don&#8217;t get what they want when they want from there parents, when the children do nothing.</p>
<p> Some Americans complain that they can&#8217;t get jobs, that don&#8217;t have no  car, that our economy sucks, and they say this because all they can get is a 8$ job and they want better. They complain because they want a better life, is that bad? to want the best for yourself,to be the best that you can be? If anyone in  a third world county were in my shoes, they would also be all they can be, buying triple patted sandwiches and driving in a car for ther work.</p>
<p>I am very open-minded and would like to visit other countries just to see how things are, to meet people, to appreciate, to look at other cultures and if I have to eat potatoes everyday, I will.</p>
<p>What is poor, it&#8217;s this</p>
<p>Poor equates to people who live in the ghetto, or slums. They live in fear of dying from other people. They can barley afford food and ther housing( ow yea, they live in houses or apartments because you can&#8217;t build a house in a city,even if there is nothing but wildlife and trees, if cops catch you, you&#8217;ll get it taken away, and its hard to live off the grid, with no one and nothing, you&#8217;d pity much have to learn a complete new life style, like an Indian, and you can&#8217;t farm and plant potatoes). poor have tiny TVs, and don&#8217;t worry it doesn&#8217;t cost much thy are not spoiled.</p>
<p>A lot of poor parts of America have gangs and drugs. which means thers a good chance you will get your stuff stolen,specially if you&#8217;re an easy target, which makes kids join gangs to seek protection. now they must kill, threat in, represent theer gang, steal, do drugs, sell drugs. ther no going back now, those kids and their kid will be in the grand life style. always having to watch ther back, being afraid to die, or family dyeing.</p>
<p>They make money but at a price.they may also get addicted to drugs, which may cost them there live. the sad part is, they don&#8217;t really have a choice, they are pressured to go into that life style since children. that is poor. </p>
<p>Sounds like a wonderful life doesnt it. But that&#8217;s rich in other countries so they shouldnt complain. get real, we got brains, and if some has to live a bad life,wether it be, no food, no electricity, gangs, America China, Germany, it doesnt matter, they can complain, who cares. if you&#8217;re not allowed to complain because its pointless then don&#8217;t but either way they are poor. please, im sure you would love to change your normal or poor life for a poor persons life in america because that s rich for you right. good luck dodging bullets.</p>
<p>All I see are negative comments, come on now, wish you could switch lives with them, because the poor here are rich, and you dont have to work hard for it, right.</p>
<p>Lastly no hard feelings, good luck, Nice article, and I am a patriot, and don&#8217;t be such a hater. Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thomas Jefferson on taxes by Mark Biernat</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/thomas-jefferson-on-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-9242</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Biernat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=924#comment-9242</guid>
		<description>In a liberal (classical liberal, like the founding fathers) society it is pretty well establish that charitable donations increase. In a socialist society people do not tend to give to charity. I think it is because they are being forced to via the tax system.
WWII was a struggle between national socialism and soviet socialism.
With broad strokes of the brush we could go on, I wish there was one modern day lib that would write a rebuttal here, but to date no one from the modern left can come up with an arguement that will hold water.

Think about it, both domestically and internationally a society that is committed to the principles of individual liberty rather than trying to engineer the &#039;common good&#039; at home and around the world will result in a society that is better off. I believe after living under the yoke of the British Empire the founding fathers like Jefferson understood this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a liberal (classical liberal, like the founding fathers) society it is pretty well establish that charitable donations increase. In a socialist society people do not tend to give to charity. I think it is because they are being forced to via the tax system.<br />
WWII was a struggle between national socialism and soviet socialism.<br />
With broad strokes of the brush we could go on, I wish there was one modern day lib that would write a rebuttal here, but to date no one from the modern left can come up with an arguement that will hold water.</p>
<p>Think about it, both domestically and internationally a society that is committed to the principles of individual liberty rather than trying to engineer the &#8216;common good&#8217; at home and around the world will result in a society that is better off. I believe after living under the yoke of the British Empire the founding fathers like Jefferson understood this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thomas Jefferson on taxes by Jewel</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/thomas-jefferson-on-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-9214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=924#comment-9214</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget who started the world wars.  It wasn&#039;t capitalists, and it was the progressives who argued for the taxed state.  Capitalists could have financed our defense/defense of others without direct taxation. It&#039;s amazing how much (we evil) capitalists can cough up when it&#039;s for a good cause, and how the rest of the world turns to us when they are hungry or need defending. Our &quot;government&quot; - which is really the American people, is now financing turtle crossings in California and studies that look into how cow farts impact global warming. Hmmmm.  I don&#039;t think either Jefferson or Hamilton would approve.  If California is worried about their turtles becoming road kill,then the taxpayers of CA can pay for it. Leave my wallet alone. As for global warming - I still don&#039;t understand how the polar icecaps melted during the interglacial period when there were no capitalists around to pollute the world.  Must&#039;ve been those cows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget who started the world wars.  It wasn&#8217;t capitalists, and it was the progressives who argued for the taxed state.  Capitalists could have financed our defense/defense of others without direct taxation. It&#8217;s amazing how much (we evil) capitalists can cough up when it&#8217;s for a good cause, and how the rest of the world turns to us when they are hungry or need defending. Our &#8220;government&#8221; &#8211; which is really the American people, is now financing turtle crossings in California and studies that look into how cow farts impact global warming. Hmmmm.  I don&#8217;t think either Jefferson or Hamilton would approve.  If California is worried about their turtles becoming road kill,then the taxpayers of CA can pay for it. Leave my wallet alone. As for global warming &#8211; I still don&#8217;t understand how the polar icecaps melted during the interglacial period when there were no capitalists around to pollute the world.  Must&#8217;ve been those cows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 101 reasons &#8211; Obama in 2012 will not be re-elected by Mark Biernat</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/obama-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-9066</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Biernat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=2249#comment-9066</guid>
		<description>First the way you start your comment is a little emotion base, by using terms like &#039;loon&#039; or &#039;joke&#039;  or &#039;way out there&#039; or &#039;stupid&#039;, instead of being more objective and factual.

Ron Paul&#039;s ideas are pretty solid, such as free money or a least make the Federal Reserve bank less dangerous.  I mean they did start the business cycles in pretty much ever crisis from the Great Depression to the present.  The Income tax is a burden not a blessing on the American people. The wars over the last ten years and before were a waste, those resources could have been applied to something great in R&amp;D for example. 

Even though, Dr, Paul will not get elected in 2012 but I hope more Americans will yield to the logic of this ideas. Just pick up some works of the Austrian economists ( and yes I did study those writers in their original books). Brilliant minds.

I do not think Obama is trying to intentionally usurp power from the American people as part of a master plan. however, I do think the Bush-Obama doctrine is questionable and unconstitutional. I do think the detention of US citizens is wrong. I think the American election is a battlefield over state socialism and the common good or maximizing the greater good by protecting the freedom of the individual.

I lived in Eastern Europe too long to believe in the fairy-tale of the state as the protector of the common good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First the way you start your comment is a little emotion base, by using terms like &#8216;loon&#8217; or &#8216;joke&#8217;  or &#8216;way out there&#8217; or &#8216;stupid&#8217;, instead of being more objective and factual.</p>
<p>Ron Paul&#8217;s ideas are pretty solid, such as free money or a least make the Federal Reserve bank less dangerous.  I mean they did start the business cycles in pretty much ever crisis from the Great Depression to the present.  The Income tax is a burden not a blessing on the American people. The wars over the last ten years and before were a waste, those resources could have been applied to something great in R&#038;D for example. </p>
<p>Even though, Dr, Paul will not get elected in 2012 but I hope more Americans will yield to the logic of this ideas. Just pick up some works of the Austrian economists ( and yes I did study those writers in their original books). Brilliant minds.</p>
<p>I do not think Obama is trying to intentionally usurp power from the American people as part of a master plan. however, I do think the Bush-Obama doctrine is questionable and unconstitutional. I do think the detention of US citizens is wrong. I think the American election is a battlefield over state socialism and the common good or maximizing the greater good by protecting the freedom of the individual.</p>
<p>I lived in Eastern Europe too long to believe in the fairy-tale of the state as the protector of the common good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 101 reasons &#8211; Obama in 2012 will not be re-elected by Jim</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/obama-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-8921</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=2249#comment-8921</guid>
		<description>I can see you are a Ron Paul fan, even though he has a couple of good idea&#039;s he is a loon to most of us. His foriegn policy idea&#039;s are way out there, saying Iran has the right to nukes. Nevertheless my point is it&#039;s the economy stupid 1st, the small arms treaty to take away our 2nd Amendment 2nd, obummercare 3rd, Federal debt 4th. Those are the main reasons people better wake the hell up. Then the NDAA falls in there, unspeified detention of American citizens indefinatley. Obama is not stupid, he just isn&#039;t smart, he knows exactly what he is doing. Every decision he has made is designed to undermine the Constitution, Capitalism and our freedoms. And I haven&#039;t even touched on the gun running to the drug cartels. America has been the hope for the world, when they are down we have been there to pick them up, yes that has meant militarily sometimes but we are the strength that keeps tyrants in check. Now we have a tyrant at our helm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see you are a Ron Paul fan, even though he has a couple of good idea&#8217;s he is a loon to most of us. His foriegn policy idea&#8217;s are way out there, saying Iran has the right to nukes. Nevertheless my point is it&#8217;s the economy stupid 1st, the small arms treaty to take away our 2nd Amendment 2nd, obummercare 3rd, Federal debt 4th. Those are the main reasons people better wake the hell up. Then the NDAA falls in there, unspeified detention of American citizens indefinatley. Obama is not stupid, he just isn&#8217;t smart, he knows exactly what he is doing. Every decision he has made is designed to undermine the Constitution, Capitalism and our freedoms. And I haven&#8217;t even touched on the gun running to the drug cartels. America has been the hope for the world, when they are down we have been there to pick them up, yes that has meant militarily sometimes but we are the strength that keeps tyrants in check. Now we have a tyrant at our helm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to get rich by Mark Biernat</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/how-to-get-rich/comment-page-1/#comment-8868</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Biernat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=1406#comment-8868</guid>
		<description>There are no rules. I do not think it matters that much and depends more on the brain, mostly creativity and attitude and modest traditional intellect. I know entrepreneurs who never had a job in their life, while others were corporate warriors.  The corporate guys tend to have more financial capital behind them but more convergent thinking. The non-corporate workers tend to have more divergent thinking in my experience and make money on intellectual capital. 

If I had to do it all over again I would have gotten my Master&#039;s in Economics and then started off being an entrepreneur. I mean I worked in the corporate world for companies like PWC and Merril Lynch and it made me an excel power user, and an expert at TPS reports but nothing else except a pretty resume. I think it is not as important as understanding how markets works. I also education enriches your life and you relate to people different if pride does not corrupt you.

It reminds me of the choices in the board game of life.

A simple metaphor to think about is this: I think many guys out there say they wish they joined the military to give and teach then disciple. Well when I worked on the loading docks and the ex military guys we hired did not impress me as having any more disciple than the skinny guys with long hair in  black head banger t-shirts who just worked really hard. In fact, I would say they had less and learned more how to &#039;pace themselves&#039;.  I concluded the only type of disciple was self disciple. And similarly the lesson here is the corporate work might teach you some skills, but not worth the tour of duty. Nothing you can not learn on your own. 

I can highly recommend a liberal arts education to broaden the mind then go right to being an entrepreneur. If you are young and poor and fail nothing lost. But once you are in business and have a family you get comfortable and your ability to fail is comprised if your wife is not standing on the bow of your ship looking in the same direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no rules. I do not think it matters that much and depends more on the brain, mostly creativity and attitude and modest traditional intellect. I know entrepreneurs who never had a job in their life, while others were corporate warriors.  The corporate guys tend to have more financial capital behind them but more convergent thinking. The non-corporate workers tend to have more divergent thinking in my experience and make money on intellectual capital. </p>
<p>If I had to do it all over again I would have gotten my Master&#8217;s in Economics and then started off being an entrepreneur. I mean I worked in the corporate world for companies like PWC and Merril Lynch and it made me an excel power user, and an expert at TPS reports but nothing else except a pretty resume. I think it is not as important as understanding how markets works. I also education enriches your life and you relate to people different if pride does not corrupt you.</p>
<p>It reminds me of the choices in the board game of life.</p>
<p>A simple metaphor to think about is this: I think many guys out there say they wish they joined the military to give and teach then disciple. Well when I worked on the loading docks and the ex military guys we hired did not impress me as having any more disciple than the skinny guys with long hair in  black head banger t-shirts who just worked really hard. In fact, I would say they had less and learned more how to &#8216;pace themselves&#8217;.  I concluded the only type of disciple was self disciple. And similarly the lesson here is the corporate work might teach you some skills, but not worth the tour of duty. Nothing you can not learn on your own. </p>
<p>I can highly recommend a liberal arts education to broaden the mind then go right to being an entrepreneur. If you are young and poor and fail nothing lost. But once you are in business and have a family you get comfortable and your ability to fail is comprised if your wife is not standing on the bow of your ship looking in the same direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to get rich by Frank</title>
		<link>http://political-economy.com/how-to-get-rich/comment-page-1/#comment-8862</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://political-economy.com/?p=1406#comment-8862</guid>
		<description>Can one start from a young age or, do we have to expirience the &quot;pleasures&quot; of working in corporate system before opting out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can one start from a young age or, do we have to expirience the &#8220;pleasures&#8221; of working in corporate system before opting out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

